Corporate Adviser
  • Content Hubs
  • Magazine
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Video
    • Master Trust Conference 2024 videos
  • Research & Guides
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Adviser
No Result
View All Result

SPP calls for proportionality to TPR DB funding consultations

by Muna Abdi
March 23, 2023
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Pinterest

The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has responded to The Pensions Regulator’s (TPR) two consultations: the consultation on the draught defined benefit (DB) funding code of practice and the consultation on “fast track and our regulatory approach.”

In its responses, the SPP has identified areas that TPR should take into further consideration. According to SPP, the increased demands placed on schemes are out of proportion to the benefits the code offers; the heavy demands placed on trustees will drive up adviser costs significantly for many plans. 

SPP also argues that the code is too long and complex and TPR should try to keep it as simple as possible given the necessity for lay trustees to comprehend the code. It should also remove any “advice” text to put the code’s main needs and concepts at the forefront.

According to SPP, although useful, not everyone agrees with TPR’s interpretation of the rules. TPR ought to collaborate with DWP to amend the regulations’ language so that it accords with its understandings in order to reduce any potential legal repercussions that such interpretational ambiguities might subject schemes to.

The suggested formulaic approach to covenant has various disadvantages and won’t work for many schemes. We propose a principles-based approach to covenant that keeps covenant at the core of the system while allowing trustees and covenant consultants more latitude.

Contrary to fast track, which lacks covenant requirements, the drafted regulations and code prioritise covenant in the process of travel planning. The SPP encourages TPR to make it extremely apparent that covenant is still a crucial factor in FastTrack-compliant schemes.

SPP says the final version of TPR should make it clearer that adherence to fast track does not automatically imply adherence to the code and that the code is of utmost importance.

Based on more recent market conditions, which schemes will be eligible for fast-track review should be determined again. This will aid TPR in understanding possible effects, as well as trustees, employers, and advisers.

Society of Pension Professionals president Steve Hitchiner says: “We support the fundamental objectives of the new funding regime, but some aspects require revision to make the proposals workable for all schemes. Covenant assessment should be proportionate to a scheme’s situation, and we suggest that this is made clearer in the code and further guidance. Many of the requirements could also be eased for certain schemes, such as those that are immature or Fast-Track compliant. Overall, we believe that TPR should aim for a code that is simpler, shorter and focussed on the key areas that inform scheme strategy.”

VIDEO FROM ROYAL LONDON


Find out more about how to support the switching of a workplace pension

Corporate Adviser Special Report

REQUEST YOUR COPY

Most Popular

  • Govt sets out roadmap for blockbuster pension reforms

  • Standard Life launches financial coaching platform for families

  • TPT launches managed retirement income for life offering

  • Govt Spending Review: industry reaction

  • Capital Cranfield appoints LGIM DB head as trustee

  • Underestimating life expectancy leading to £35,000 shortfall in pension planning: BW

Corporate Adviser

© 2017-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • T&Cs
  • Contact

Follow Us

X
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.