Despite a huge correction exercise currently being undertaken by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) on historic state pension awards, errors are still being made on new state pension awards according to LCP partner Steve Webb.
The former pensions minister has now written to the current pensions minister GuyOpperman, giving examples of recent errors and calling for further action to improve accuracy.
A key area of error relates to women who previously paid a reduced rate of National Insurance Contributions, commonly known as the ‘married woman’s stamp’. These women can find that under the rules of the new state pension they lack the 10 years of full rate contributions necessary to qualify for any state pension.
But the new system has a special concession for such women, provided that they were paying the reduced stamp 35 years before they retired. Such women can automatically get a pension of £85 per week if they are married or £141.85 if they are widowed or divorced.
A previous FOI request from Steve Webb revealed that DWP discovered in 2019 that it was making errors on such cases and a correction exercise was put in place at the time. But Webb says he has continued to hear from women who have wrongly been told they have no pension entitlement, including one who retired in April 2022.
He has therefore written to DWP with details of four such cases and is calling for action to be taken to stop this from happening again.
Webb says: “When the DWP admitted to me that they had been making errors for this group of women I assumed that they would have put in place procedures to sort out the problem.
“Yet I continue to hear from women who have been wrongly told that they are not entitled to a pension. What concerns me most is how many other women there may be who simply trusted what DWP have told them and are now struggling to get by without the pension which is rightfully theirs. DWP should be checking all their records for such cases and putting things right, as well as making sure that these mistakes cannot happen again”.
