Corporate Adviser
  • Content Hubs
  • Magazine
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Video
    • Master Trust Conference 2024 videos
  • Research & Guides
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Adviser
No Result
View All Result

Quarter may opt out of AE at 8pc contribution

by John Greenwood
August 15, 2016
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Pinterest
I’m in – auto-enrolment

Nearly a quarter of workers could opt out of their scheme when minimum contributions hit 8 per cent, according to new research.

A survey for Now: Pensions found 24 per cent of employees “definitely will” or “might” opt out, when minimum contributions hit 8 of qualifying earnings in 2019. But 74 per cent of those that intend to opt out when contributions rise to 8 per cent say they would either “definitely” or “probably” continue to save into their workplace pension if contributions were reversed so that and employers put in a minimum of 5 per cent and employees make a 3 per cent contribution.

Two thirds – 66 per cent of those surveyed believe that the total auto enrolment minimum contribution of 8 per cent is adequate, with 21 per cent believing it should be increased.

Now: Pensions CEO Morten Nilsson says: “At the moment the message is strong and clear – you pay in and your employer matches it.

“But, as contributions increase, employees will find themselves paying in more than their employer and this inequality could drive opt outs.

“With the 2017 review of auto enrolment just around the corner, the government should consider rebalancing contributions for a more equitable split to encourage a greater proportion to continue to save.

“Losing savers at this stage could be damaging and have long term consequences for the success of the policy.”

 

Corporate Adviser Special Report

REQUEST YOUR COPY

Most Popular

  • WTW to acquire Cushon

  • Mercer UK on track for £25bn megafund target ahead of 2030 deadline

  • Targeted support-ready workplace digital adviser launches

  • In focus: Green light for retirement-only CDC

  • Salary sacrifice changes will impact how one in four firms fund benefits: research

  • FCA unveils targeted support framework for savers

Corporate Adviser

© 2017-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • T&Cs
  • Contact

Follow Us

X
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.