The planned merger of income tax and National Insurance contributions will create more upheaval than A-Day, and could lead to the end of salary sacrifice, experts have warned.
But the long timescale envisaged for the introduction of the change means existing salary sacrifice implementations need not be put on hold.
Chancellor George Osborne announced in the Budget a plan to merge income tax and NI, although he said NI would not be extended to pensioners or other forms of income, and added that the contributory principle would be retained.
The Government will issue a consultation on the matter, and says the huge complexity of the change means it will be years before it is fully implemented.
Bluefin says the merger of income tax and NI will affect a wide range of the benefits that corporate intermediaries advise upon, including critical illness cover, company cars, cash plans and pensions.
Osborne said: “For decades, we have operated Income Tax and National Insurance as two fundamentally different taxes and forced businesses large and small to operate two completely different systems of administration, with two different periods and bases of charge. The resulting anomalies are legion.
“And it imposes totally unnecessary costs and complexity on employers, and costs the taxpayer in the extra burden it places on HM Revenue & Customs.
“This huge task will therefore require a great deal of consultation and take a number of years to complete. But it is time we took this historic step to simplify dramatically our tax system and make it fit for the modern age.”
Rob Thomas, associate at Barnett Waddingham says: “Salary sacrifice will almost certainly end. If NI does not exist because it has been merged into one overall tax the benefits to employees and employers around salary sacrifice is lost. This would also have a knock on effect to some flexible benefit schemes.
“Ending salary sacrifice will hit many employers pretty hard. This is at a time when pension scheme costs are going to rise due to auto-enrolment and contracting out is going to cease for final salary schemes if there is no second tier state pension to contract out from. This will mean that many employers utilising salary sacrifice for the payment of pension contributions will be hit by increased NI costs which may be in addition to increased pension costs as a result of other pension reforms taking place .”
Robin Hames, head of technical at Bluefin says: “The effects of a merger of income tax and national insurance will create a bigger upheaval than the A-Day simplification changes. All the contribution-based state benefits would have to be radically amended, and while that might be a laudable aim there are serious obstacles to overcome.
“For more than a decade it seems like the merger of PAYE and NI has been the holy grail of simplification but two of the major obstacles have been the contribution-based nature of a range of state benefits, and the fact that there are a number of employee benefits that do not have the same tax and NI treatment.
“A combined tax and NI rate would create winners and losers if it’s applied across the board. Any new tax treatment of employee benefits will drive changes that employers make to their pay and benefit packages. Benefits with different treatment include critical illness, company cars, hospital cash plans, and of course pensions.
David Robbins, senior consultant at Towers Watson says: “At present there is still a lot of uncertainty as to what they will put in its place, so the future of salary sacrifice is unclear. But the timescale they are talking about means there is no reason to stop current implementations.
Robert Reid, director of Syndaxi Financial Planning says: “This could create problems in future as many flex schemes have been set up on the basis that the NI savings will pay for them.”
The planned merger of income tax and National Insurance contributions will create more upheaval than A-Day, and could lead to the end of salary sacrifice, experts have warned.
But the long timescale envisaged for the introduction of the change means existing salary sacrifice implementations need not be put on hold.
Chancellor George Osborne announced in the Budget a plan to merge income tax and NI, although he said NI would not be extended to pensioners or other forms of income, and added that the contributory principle would be retained.
The Government will issue a consultation on the matter, and says the huge complexity of the change means it will be years before it is fully implemented.
Bluefin says the merger of income tax and NI will affect a wide range of the benefits that corporate intermediaries advise upon, including critical illness cover, company cars, cash plans and pensions.
Osborne said: “For decades, we have operated Income Tax and National Insurance as two fundamentally different taxes and forced businesses large and small to operate two completely different systems of administration, with two different periods and bases of charge. The resulting anomalies are legion.
“And it imposes totally unnecessary costs and complexity on employers, and costs the taxpayer in the extra burden it places on HM Revenue & Customs.
“This huge task will therefore require a great deal of consultation and take a number of years to complete. But it is time we took this historic step to simplify dramatically our tax system and make it fit for the modern age.”
Rob Thomas, associate at Barnett Waddingham says: “Salary sacrifice will almost certainly end. If NI does not exist because it has been merged into one overall tax the benefits to employees and employers around salary sacrifice is lost. This would also have a knock on effect to some flexible benefit schemes.
“Ending salary sacrifice will hit many employers pretty hard. This is at a time when pension scheme costs are going to rise due to auto-enrolment and contracting out is going to cease for final salary schemes if there is no second tier state pension to contract out from. This will mean that many employers utilising salary sacrifice for the payment of pension contributions will be hit by increased NI costs which may be in addition to increased pension costs as a result of other pension reforms taking place .”
Robin Hames, head of technical at Bluefin says: “The effects of a merger of income tax and national insurance will create a bigger upheaval than the A-Day simplification changes. All the contribution-based state benefits would have to be radically amended, and while that might be a laudable aim there are serious obstacles to overcome.
“For more than a decade it seems like the merger of PAYE and NI has been the holy grail of simplification but two of the major obstacles have been the contribution-based nature of a range of state benefits, and the fact that there are a number of employee benefits that do not have the same tax and NI treatment.
“A combined tax and NI rate would create winners and losers if it’s applied across the board. Any new tax treatment of employee benefits will drive changes that employers make to their pay and benefit packages. Benefits with different treatment include critical illness, company cars, hospital cash plans, and of course pensions.
David Robbins, senior consultant at Towers Watson says: “At present there is still a lot of uncertainty as to what they will put in its place, so the future of salary sacrifice is unclear. But the timescale they are talking about means there is no reason to stop current implementations.
Robert Reid, director of Syndaxi Financial Planning says: “This could create problems in future as many flex schemes have been set up on the basis that the NI savings will pay for them.”
The planned merger of income tax and National Insurance contributions will create more upheaval than A-Day, and could lead to the end of salary sacrifice, experts have warned.
But the long timescale envisaged for the introduction of the change means existing salary sacrifice implementations need not be put on hold.
Chancellor George Osborne announced in the Budget a plan to merge income tax and NI, although he said NI would not be extended to pensioners or other forms of income, and added that the contributory principle would be retained.
The Government will issue a consultation on the matter, and says the huge complexity of the change means it will be years before it is fully implemented.
Bluefin says the merger of income tax and NI will affect a wide range of the benefits that corporate intermediaries advise upon, including critical illness cover, company cars, cash plans and pensions.
Osborne said: “For decades, we have operated Income Tax and National Insurance as two fundamentally different taxes and forced businesses large and small to operate two completely different systems of administration, with two different periods and bases of charge. The resulting anomalies are legion.
“And it imposes totally unnecessary costs and complexity on employers, and costs the taxpayer in the extra burden it places on HM Revenue & Customs.
“This huge task will therefore require a great deal of consultation and take a number of years to complete. But it is time we took this historic step to simplify dramatically our tax system and make it fit for the modern age.”
Rob Thomas, associate at Barnett Waddingham says: “Salary sacrifice will almost certainly end. If NI does not exist because it has been merged into one overall tax the benefits to employees and employers around salary sacrifice is lost. This would also have a knock on effect to some flexible benefit schemes.
“Ending salary sacrifice will hit many employers pretty hard. This is at a time when pension scheme costs are going to rise due to auto-enrolment and contracting out is going to cease for final salary schemes if there is no second tier state pension to contract out from. This will mean that many employers utilising salary sacrifice for the payment of pension contributions will be hit by increased NI costs which may be in addition to increased pension costs as a result of other pension reforms taking place .”
Robin Hames, head of technical at Bluefin says: “The effects of a merger of income tax and national insurance will create a bigger upheaval than the A-Day simplification changes. All the contribution-based state benefits would have to be radically amended, and while that might be a laudable aim there are serious obstacles to overcome.
“For more than a decade it seems like the merger of PAYE and NI has been the holy grail of simplification but two of the major obstacles have been the contribution-based nature of a range of state benefits, and the fact that there are a number of employee benefits that do not have the same tax and NI treatment.
“A combined tax and NI rate would create winners and losers if it’s applied across the board. Any new tax treatment of employee benefits will drive changes that employers make to their pay and benefit packages. Benefits with different treatment include critical illness, company cars, hospital cash plans, and of course pensions.
David Robbins, senior consultant at Towers Watson says: “At present there is still a lot of uncertainty as to what they will put in its place, so the future of salary sacrifice is unclear. But the timescale they are talking about means there is no reason to stop current implementations.
Robert Reid, director of Syndaxi Financial Planning says: “This could create problems in future as many flex schemes have been set up on the basis that the NI savings will pay for them.”
The planned merger of income tax and National Insurance contributions will create more upheaval than A-Day, and could lead to the end of salary sacrifice, experts have warned.
But the long timescale envisaged for the introduction of the change means existing salary sacrifice implementations need not be put on hold.
Chancellor George Osborne announced in the Budget a plan to merge income tax and NI, although he said NI would not be extended to pensioners or other forms of income, and added that the contributory principle would be retained.
The Government will issue a consultation on the matter, and says the huge complexity of the change means it will be years before it is fully implemented.
Bluefin says the merger of income tax and NI will affect a wide range of the benefits that corporate intermediaries advise upon, including critical illness cover, company cars, cash plans and pensions.
Osborne said: “For decades, we have operated Income Tax and National Insurance as two fundamentally different taxes and forced businesses large and small to operate two completely different systems of administration, with two different periods and bases of charge. The resulting anomalies are legion.
“And it imposes totally unnecessary costs and complexity on employers, and costs the taxpayer in the extra burden it places on HM Revenue & Customs.
“This huge task will therefore require a great deal of consultation and take a number of years to complete. But it is time we took this historic step to simplify dramatically our tax system and make it fit for the modern age.”
Rob Thomas, associate at Barnett Waddingham says: “Salary sacrifice will almost certainly end. If NI does not exist because it has been merged into one overall tax the benefits to employees and employers around salary sacrifice is lost. This would also have a knock on effect to some flexible benefit schemes.
“Ending salary sacrifice will hit many employers pretty hard. This is at a time when pension scheme costs are going to rise due to auto-enrolment and contracting out is going to cease for final salary schemes if there is no second tier state pension to contract out from. This will mean that many employers utilising salary sacrifice for the payment of pension contributions will be hit by increased NI costs which may be in addition to increased pension costs as a result of other pension reforms taking place .”
Robin Hames, head of technical at Bluefin says: “The effects of a merger of income tax and national insurance will create a bigger upheaval than the A-Day simplification changes. All the contribution-based state benefits would have to be radically amended, and while that might be a laudable aim there are serious obstacles to overcome.
“For more than a decade it seems like the merger of PAYE and NI has been the holy grail of simplification but two of the major obstacles have been the contribution-based nature of a range of state benefits, and the fact that there are a number of employee benefits that do not have the same tax and NI treatment.
“A combined tax and NI rate would create winners and losers if it’s applied across the board. Any new tax treatment of employee benefits will drive changes that employers make to their pay and benefit packages. Benefits with different treatment include critical illness, company cars, hospital cash plans, and of course pensions.
David Robbins, senior consultant at Towers Watson says: “At present there is still a lot of uncertainty as to what they will put in its place, so the future of salary sacrifice is unclear. But the timescale they are talking about means there is no reason to stop current implementations.
Robert Reid, director of Syndaxi Financial Planning says: “This could create problems in future as many flex schemes have been set up on the basis that the NI savings will pay for them.”
