Corporate Adviser
  • Content Hubs
  • Magazine
  • Alerts
  • Events
  • Video
    • Master Trust Conference 2024 videos
  • Research & Guides
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG
No Result
View All Result
Corporate Adviser
No Result
View All Result

Defined benefit schemes continue to fall in popularity

by admin
April 1, 2008
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Pinterest

Respondents to this year’s survey are divided 50/50 over the value of their DB schemes. Half of the 123 respondents did not see their scheme as worth it, being too expensive to run. With continuing increased costs and complexity, the alternative of giving money directly to employees or to a DC scheme is now an attractive option for employers.

Over a quarter had considered inducement deals for members to transfer out, and a third have considered buying out liabilities.

Surprisingly 90 per cent of respondents felt they had a good understanding of the strength of the covenant of the scheme sponsor. Buck says this is surprising in light of the fact that the Pensions Regulator reports that not many sets of trustees have taken external advice on this subject, despite the sometimes complex legal ownership structures of sponsoring employers.

Kevin LeGrand, head of technical services at Buck, says: “For the first time in many years, the funding position of schemes was not at the top of the list of pension headaches. The somewhat benign economic situation over the period of the survey, combined with payments of higher contributions, has improved the funding position of many schemes; some are even in surplus. However, the recent turmoil in the markets and the current credit crunch have once again got employers struggling to come to terms with their future pension commitments.”

Corporate Adviser Special Report

REQUEST YOUR COPY

Most Popular

  • Gallagher acquires First Actuarial

  • WTW poised to snap up NatWest Cushon

  • Govt to introduce legislation to widen definition of fiduciary duty

  • Howden appoints CFO

  • People’s Pension appoints Robeco to manage £3.6bn emerging markets portfolio

  • Hargreaves Lansdown appoints chief product officer

Corporate Adviser

© 2017-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy policy
  • T&Cs
  • Contact

Follow Us

X
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • In Depth
  • Profile
  • Pensions
    • Auto-enrolment
    • DB
    • DC
    • Defaults
    • Investment
    • Master Trusts
    • Sipps & SSAS
    • Taxation
  • Group Risk
    • Group Life
    • Group IP
    • Group CIC
    • Mental Health
    • Rehab
    • Wellbeing
  • Healthcare
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Mental Health
    • IPT
    • Wellbeing
    • Trusts
    • Cash Plans
  • Wellbeing
    • Mental Health
    • Health & Wellbeing
    • Financial resilience
  • ESG

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.